mirror of
https://github.com/Drezil/imgui.git
synced 2024-11-26 13:37:00 +00:00
Merge branch 'master' of https://github.com/ocornut/imgui
This commit is contained in:
commit
ab97b42935
@ -126,6 +126,10 @@ If you intend to display large lists of items (say, 1000+) it can be beneficial
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
You can alter the look of the interface to some degree: changing colors, sizes, padding, rounding, fonts. However, as ImGui is designed and optimised to create debug tools, the amount of skinning you can apply is limited. There is only so much you can stray away from the default look and feel of the interface.
|
You can alter the look of the interface to some degree: changing colors, sizes, padding, rounding, fonts. However, as ImGui is designed and optimised to create debug tools, the amount of skinning you can apply is limited. There is only so much you can stray away from the default look and feel of the interface.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
This is [LumixEngine](https://github.com/nem0/LumixEngine) with a minor skinning hack + a docking/tabs extension (both of which you can find in the Issues section and will eventually be merged).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[![Skinning in LumixEngine](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/8225057/13198792/92808c5c-d812-11e5-9507-16b63918b05b.jpg)](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/8225057/13044612/59f07aec-d3cf-11e5-8ccb-39adf2e13e69.png)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
<b>Why using C++ (as opposed to C)?</b>
|
<b>Why using C++ (as opposed to C)?</b>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
ImGui takes advantage of a few C++ features for convenience but nothing anywhere Boost-insanity/quagmire. In particular, function overloading and default parameters are used to make the API easier to use and code more terse. Doing so I believe the API is sitting on a sweet spot and giving up on those features would make the API more cumbersome. Other features such as namespace, constructors and templates (in the case of the ImVector<> class) are also relied on as a convenience but could be removed.
|
ImGui takes advantage of a few C++ features for convenience but nothing anywhere Boost-insanity/quagmire. In particular, function overloading and default parameters are used to make the API easier to use and code more terse. Doing so I believe the API is sitting on a sweet spot and giving up on those features would make the API more cumbersome. Other features such as namespace, constructors and templates (in the case of the ImVector<> class) are also relied on as a convenience but could be removed.
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user