403 lines
12 KiB
Plaintext
403 lines
12 KiB
Plaintext
---
|
|
title: Sketch for simulating chemodiversity
|
|
author: Stefan Dresselhaus
|
|
date: \today
|
|
format: markdown+lhs
|
|
|
|
papersize: a4
|
|
fontsize: 10pt
|
|
documentclass: scrartcl
|
|
|
|
width: 1920
|
|
height: 1080
|
|
margin: 0.2
|
|
theme: solarized
|
|
slideNumber: true
|
|
|
|
...
|
|
|
|
(rough) sketch components responsible for chemodiversity
|
|
========================================================
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
Genes
|
|
-----
|
|
|
|
- define which enzymes are produced in which quantities
|
|
- list in fig. 1 in [[1](git@github.com:hakimel/reveal.js.git)]
|
|
- can be scaled down/inactivated (i.e. when predators leave for generations)
|
|
- easy to ramp up production as long as the genes are still there
|
|
- plants can survive without problems with inactive PSM-cycles when no
|
|
adversaries are present.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
=== Inheritance & Mutation
|
|
|
|
- via whole-genome and local-genome duplication
|
|
- copies accumulate mutations that lead to neofunctionalization
|
|
- e.g. subtle differences in terpene synthases can yield vastly different products
|
|
- i.e. these changes can appear easily
|
|
- need to classify products by "chemical distance" for simulation
|
|
- **TODO**: Map/Markov-Chain of mutations that may occur here?
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
=== Evolutional strategies
|
|
|
|
- "Bet-hedging": reduce variations of fitness over time
|
|
- **TODO**: understand
|
|
- different effects of intra-cohort-variation vs. inter-cohort-variation
|
|
- Plants with inactive PSM can survive if predators are deterred by other
|
|
individuals due to automimicry-effect which *could* foster wider genetic
|
|
variance
|
|
- the more of those individuals are present in a population, the less their
|
|
overall fitness becomes.
|
|
- **TODO**: fitness must also be able to depend on relative appearance of
|
|
adversarial traits in the population
|
|
- Keyword: Frequency-dependent-selection (FDS)
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
Pathways to produce chemical compounds
|
|
--------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
- 40k+ compounds just stem from compounds of the calvin-cycle taking the
|
|
MEP-pathway or from the krebs-cycle taking the MVA-pathway
|
|
- both yield the same intermediate product that forms the basis.
|
|
- 10k+ compounds are amino-acid-derivatives
|
|
- Chapter VI in [[1](git@github.com:hakimel/reveal.js.git)] exemplary describes 4 complete different pathways that yield
|
|
compounds.
|
|
- similar compounds/pathways should be found in the simulation
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
=== Consequences of producing compounds
|
|
|
|
- taking away parts of the calvin/krebs cycle puts pressure on those
|
|
- **TODO**: find out what they do and on what they depend.
|
|
- **TODO**: where do amino-acids come from? How much impact has the diversion of
|
|
these components?
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
Maintaining chemical diversity
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
=== + screening hypothesis
|
|
|
|
- many PSM found have no *known* biological activity
|
|
- plants "keep them around" in case another mutation needs them to produce
|
|
something "useful"
|
|
- creating things without use increase the need for photosynthesis and/or
|
|
nutrient uptake.
|
|
|
|
=== - screening hypothesis
|
|
|
|
- it is suggested that local abiotic & biotic selection pressures are the main
|
|
driver
|
|
- inactive molecules are not maintained long
|
|
- it was observed that some plants "rediscovered" some compounds in their
|
|
evolution suggesting they got rid of them when no pressure to maintain them
|
|
was applied
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
=== questions resulting from this that should be answered in the simulation
|
|
|
|
- details in chapter VIII of [[1](git@github.com:hakimel/reveal.js.git)]
|
|
- how quick can lost diversity be restored?
|
|
- how expensive is it to keep producing many inactive substances while also
|
|
producing active deterrents? Does this lead to a single point-of-failure due
|
|
to overspecialisation? What must be done to prevent this?
|
|
- strong selection pressure *should* decrease quantity of compounds due to
|
|
costs, but plants do not seem to care.
|
|
- is this diversity needed in presence of multiple different adversaries?
|
|
- does the simulation specialize when only presented with one adversary?
|
|
What about adaptive adversaries?
|
|
- adaptation in the qualitative & quantitative evolution in response to
|
|
changed pressure? (i.e. those who cannot adapt quick enough die?)
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
Scenario
|
|
========
|
|
|
|
As this is literate Haskell first a bit of throat-clearing:
|
|
|
|
> {-# LANGUAGE RecordWildCards #-}
|
|
>
|
|
> import Data.Functor ((<$>))
|
|
> import Control.Applicative ((<*>))
|
|
> import Control.Monad (forM_)
|
|
> import Data.List (permutations, subsequences)
|
|
|
|
Then some general aliases to make everything more readable:
|
|
|
|
> type Probability = Float
|
|
> type Quantity = Int
|
|
> type Activation = Float
|
|
> type Amount = Float
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
Nutrients & Compounds
|
|
---------------------
|
|
|
|
Nutrients are the basis for any reaction and are found in the environment of the
|
|
plant.
|
|
|
|
> data Nutrient = Sulfur
|
|
> | Phosphor
|
|
> | Nitrate
|
|
> | Photosynthesis
|
|
> deriving (Show, Enum, Bounded, Eq)
|
|
>
|
|
> data Component = GenericComponent Int
|
|
> | PP
|
|
> | FPP
|
|
> deriving (Show, Eq)
|
|
|
|
Compounds are either direct nutrients or already processed components
|
|
|
|
> data Compound = Substrate Nutrient
|
|
> | Produced Component
|
|
> deriving (Show, Eq)
|
|
|
|
This simple definition is only a brief sketch.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
Enzymes
|
|
-------
|
|
|
|
Enzymes are the main reaction-driver behind synthesis of intricate compounds.
|
|
|
|
> data Synthesis = Synthesis [(Compound, Amount)] (Compound,Amount)
|
|
> data Enzyme = Enzyme
|
|
> { enzymeName :: String
|
|
> -- ^ Name of the Enzyme. Enzymes with the same name are supposed
|
|
> -- to be identical.
|
|
> , substrateRequirements :: [(Nutrient,Amount)]
|
|
> -- ^ needed for reaction to take place
|
|
> , synthesis :: [Synthesis]
|
|
> -- ^ given x in amount a, this will produce y in amount b
|
|
> , dominance :: Maybe Amount
|
|
> -- ^ in case of competition for nutrients this denotes the priority
|
|
> -- Nothing = max possible
|
|
> }
|
|
>
|
|
> instance Show Enzyme where
|
|
> show (Enzyme{..}) = enzymeName
|
|
>
|
|
> instance Eq Enzyme where
|
|
> a == b = enzymeName a == enzymeName b
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
Example "enzymes" could be:
|
|
|
|
> pps :: Enzyme -- uses Phosphor from Substrate to produce PP
|
|
> pps = Enzyme "PPS" [(Phosphor,1)] syn Nothing
|
|
> where
|
|
> syn = [Synthesis [(Substrate Phosphor, 1)] (PP, 1)]
|
|
>
|
|
> fpps :: Enzyme
|
|
> fpps = Enzyme "FPPS" [] syn Nothing
|
|
> where
|
|
> syn = [Synthesis [(PP, 1)] (FPP, 1)]
|
|
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
Environment
|
|
-----------
|
|
|
|
In the environment we have predators that impact the fitness of our plants and
|
|
may be resistant to some compounds the plant produces. They can also differ in
|
|
their intensity.
|
|
|
|
> data Predator = Predator { resistance :: [Component]
|
|
> -- ^ list of components this predator is resistant to
|
|
> , fitnessImpact :: Amount
|
|
> -- ^ impact on the fitness of a plant
|
|
> -- (~ agressiveness of the herbivore)
|
|
> } deriving (Show, Eq)
|
|
|
|
Exemplatory:
|
|
|
|
> greenfly :: Predator -- 20% of plants die to greenfly, but the fly is
|
|
> greenfly = Predator [PP] 0.2 -- killed by any Component not being PP
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
The environment itself is just the soil and the predators. Extensions would be
|
|
possible.
|
|
|
|
> data Environment =
|
|
> Environment
|
|
> { soil :: [(Nutrient, Amount)]
|
|
> -- ^ soil is a list of nutrients available to the plant.
|
|
> , predators :: [(Predator, Probability)]
|
|
> -- ^ Predators with the probability of appearance in this generation.
|
|
> } deriving (Show, Eq)
|
|
|
|
Example:
|
|
|
|
> exampleEnvironment :: Environment
|
|
> exampleEnvironment =
|
|
> Environment
|
|
> { soil = [ (Nitrate, 2)
|
|
> , (Phosphor, 3)
|
|
> , (Photosynthesis, 10)
|
|
> ]
|
|
> , predators = [ (greenfly, 0.1) ]
|
|
> }
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
Plants
|
|
------
|
|
|
|
Plants consist of a Genome responsible for creation of the PSM and also an
|
|
internal state how many nutrients and compounds are currently inside the plant.
|
|
|
|
> type Genome = [(Enzyme, Quantity, Activation)]
|
|
>
|
|
> data Plant = Plant
|
|
> { genome :: Genome
|
|
> -- ^ the genetic characteristic of the plant
|
|
> , absorbNutrients :: Environment -> [(Component,Amount)]
|
|
> -- ^ the capability to absorb nutrients given an environment
|
|
> }
|
|
> instance Show Plant where
|
|
> show p = "Plant with Genome " ++ show (genome p)
|
|
> instance Eq Plant where
|
|
> a == b = genome a == genome b
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
The following example yields in the example-environment this population:
|
|
|
|
*Main> printPopulation [pps, fpps] plants
|
|
Population:
|
|
PPS ______oöö+++______oöö+++____________oöö+++oöö+++
|
|
FPPS ____________oöö+++oöö+++______oöö+++______oöö+++
|
|
|
|
> plants :: [Plant]
|
|
> plants = (\g -> Plant g defaultAbsorption) <$> genomes
|
|
> where
|
|
> enzymes = [pps, fpps]
|
|
> quantity = [1,2] :: [Quantity]
|
|
> activation = [0.7, 0.9, 1]
|
|
>
|
|
> genomes = do
|
|
> e <- permutations enzymes
|
|
> e' <- subsequences e
|
|
> q <- quantity
|
|
> a <- activation
|
|
> return $ (,,) <$> e' <*> [q] <*> [a]
|
|
>
|
|
> defaultAbsorption (Environment s _) = (\(a,b) -> (Substrate a,b))
|
|
> . limit Phosphor 2
|
|
> . limit Nitrate 1
|
|
> . limit Sulfur 0
|
|
> <$> s
|
|
> -- custom absorbtion with helper-function:
|
|
> limit :: Nutrient -> Amount -> (Nutrient, Amount) -> (Nutrient, Amount)
|
|
> limit n a (n', a')
|
|
> | n == n' = (n, min a a') -- if we should limit, then we do ;)
|
|
> | otherwise = (n', a')
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
Fitness
|
|
-------
|
|
|
|
The fitness-measure is central for the generation of offspring and the
|
|
simulation. It evaluates the probability for passing on genes given a plant in
|
|
an environment.
|
|
|
|
> type Fitness = Float
|
|
>
|
|
> fitness :: Environment -> Plant -> Fitness
|
|
> fitness e p = survivalRate
|
|
> where
|
|
> nutrients = absorbNutrients p e
|
|
> products = produceCompounds p nutrients
|
|
> survivalRate = deterPredators (predators e) products
|
|
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
> produceCompounds :: Plant -> [(Compound, Amount)] -> [Compound]
|
|
> produceCompounds (Plant genes _) = undefined
|
|
> -- this will take some constrained linear algebra-solving
|
|
>
|
|
> deterPredators :: [(Predator, Probability)] -> [Compound] -> Probability
|
|
> deterPredators ps cs = sum $ do
|
|
> c <- cs -- for every compound
|
|
> (p,prob) <- ps -- and every predator
|
|
> return (if c `notin` (resistance p) -- if the plant cannot deter the predator
|
|
> then prob * fitnessImpact p -- impact it weighted by probability
|
|
> else 0)
|
|
> where
|
|
> (Produced a) `notin` b = all (/=a) b
|
|
> _ `notin`_ = False
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mating & Creation of diversity
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
TODO
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
Running the simulation
|
|
----------------------
|
|
|
|
> main = do
|
|
> putStrLn "Environment:"
|
|
> print exampleEnvironment
|
|
> putStrLn "Example population:"
|
|
> printPopulation [pps, fpps] plants
|
|
|
|
runhaskell sketch.md.lhs
|
|
Environment:
|
|
Environment { soil = [(Nitrate,2.0),(Phosphor,3.0),(Photosynthesis,10.0)]
|
|
, predators = [(Predator {resistance = [PP], fitnessImpact = 0.2},0.1)]}
|
|
Example population:
|
|
Population:
|
|
PPS ______oöö+++______oöö+++____________oöö+++oöö+++
|
|
FPPS ____________oöö+++oöö+++______oöö+++______oöö+++
|
|
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
Utility Functions
|
|
-----------------
|
|
|
|
> getAmountOf :: Compound -> [(Compound, Amount)] -> Amount
|
|
> getAmountOf c = sum . fmap snd . filter ((== c) . fst)
|
|
>
|
|
> printPopulation :: [Enzyme] -> [Plant] -> IO ()
|
|
> printPopulation es ps = do
|
|
> let padded i str = take i $ str ++ repeat ' '
|
|
> putStrLn "Population:"
|
|
> forM_ es $ \e -> do
|
|
> putStr $ padded 8 (show e)
|
|
> forM_ ps $ \(Plant g _) -> do
|
|
> let curE = sum $ map (\(_,q,a) -> (fromIntegral q)*a)
|
|
> . filter (\(e',_,_) -> e == e')
|
|
> $ g
|
|
> plot x
|
|
> | x > 2 = "O"
|
|
> | x > 1 = "+"
|
|
> | x > 0.7 = "ö"
|
|
> | x > 0.5 = "o"
|
|
> | x > 0 = "."
|
|
> | otherwise = "_"
|
|
> putStr (plot curE)
|
|
> putStrLn ""
|