created makefile
This commit is contained in:
110
sketch.md.lhs
Normal file
110
sketch.md.lhs
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,110 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
title: Sketch for simulating chemodiversity
|
||||
author: Stefan Dresselhaus
|
||||
date: 2018-09-21
|
||||
format: markdown+lhs
|
||||
|
||||
...
|
||||
|
||||
= (rough) sketch components responsible for chemodiversity
|
||||
|
||||
== Genes
|
||||
|
||||
- define which enzymes are produced in which quantities
|
||||
- list in fig. 1 in [1]
|
||||
- can be scaled down/inactivated (i.e. when predators leave for generations)
|
||||
- easy to ramp up production as long as the genes are still there
|
||||
- plants can survive without problems with inactive PSM-cycles when no
|
||||
adversaries are present.
|
||||
|
||||
=== Inheritance & Mutation
|
||||
|
||||
- via whole-genome and local-genome duplication
|
||||
- copies accumulate mutations that lead to neofunctionalization
|
||||
- e.g. subtle differences in terpene synthases can yield vastly different products
|
||||
- i.e. these changes can appear easily
|
||||
- need to classify products by "chemical distance" for simulation
|
||||
- **TODO**: Map/Markov-Chain of mutations that may occur here?
|
||||
|
||||
=== Evolutional strategies
|
||||
|
||||
- "Bet-hedging": reduce variations of fitness over time
|
||||
- **TODO**: understand
|
||||
- different effects of intra-cohort-variation vs. inter-cohort-variation
|
||||
- Plants with inactive PSM can survive if predators are deterred by other
|
||||
individuals due to automimicry-effect which *could* foster wider genetic
|
||||
variance
|
||||
- the more of those individuals are present in a population, the less their
|
||||
overall fitness becomes.
|
||||
- **TODO**: fitness must also be able to depend on relative appearance of
|
||||
adversarial traits in the population
|
||||
- Keyword: Frequency-dependent-selection (FDS)
|
||||
|
||||
== Pathways to produce chemical compounds
|
||||
|
||||
- 40k+ compounds just stem from compounds of the calvin-cycle taking the
|
||||
MEP-pathway or from the krebs-cycle taking the MVA-pathway
|
||||
- both yield the same intermediate product that forms the basis.
|
||||
- 10k+ compounds are amino-acid-derivatives
|
||||
- Chapter VI in [1] exemplary describes 4 complete different pathways that yield
|
||||
compounds.
|
||||
- similar compounds/pathways should be found in the simulation
|
||||
|
||||
=== Consequences of producing compounds
|
||||
|
||||
- taking away parts of the calvin/krebs cycle puts pressure on those
|
||||
- **TODO**: find out what they do and on what they depend.
|
||||
- **TODO**: where do amino-acids come from? How much impact has the diversion of
|
||||
these components?
|
||||
|
||||
== Maintaining chemical diversity
|
||||
|
||||
=== + screening hypothesis
|
||||
|
||||
- many PSM found have no *known* biological activity
|
||||
- plants "keep them around" in case another mutation needs them to produce
|
||||
something "useful"
|
||||
- creating things without use increase the need for photosynthesis and/or
|
||||
nutrient uptake.
|
||||
|
||||
=== - screening hypothesis
|
||||
|
||||
- it is suggested that local abiotic & biotic selection pressures are the main
|
||||
driver
|
||||
- inactive molecules are not maintained long
|
||||
- it was observed that some plants "rediscovered" some compounds in their
|
||||
evolution suggesting they got rid of them when no pressure to maintain them
|
||||
was applied
|
||||
|
||||
==== questions resulting from this that should be answered in the simulation
|
||||
|
||||
- details in chapter VIII of [1]
|
||||
- how quick can lost diversity be restored?
|
||||
- how expensive is it to keep producing many inactive substances while also
|
||||
producing active deterrents? Does this lead to a single point-of-failure due
|
||||
to overspecialisation? What must be done to prevent this?
|
||||
- strong selection pressure *should* decrease quantity of compounds due to
|
||||
costs, but plants do not seem to care.
|
||||
- is this diversity needed in presence of multiple different adversaries?
|
||||
- does the simulation specialize when only presented with one adversary?
|
||||
What about adaptive adversaries?
|
||||
- adaptation in the qualitative & quantitative evolution in response to
|
||||
changed pressure? (i.e. those who cannot adapt quick enough die?)
|
||||
|
||||
= Scenario
|
||||
|
||||
== Plants
|
||||
|
||||
> data Foo = Bar
|
||||
|
||||
== Enzymes
|
||||
|
||||
== Herbivores
|
||||
|
||||
== Environment
|
||||
|
||||
== Fitness
|
||||
|
||||
== Mating & Creation of diversity
|
||||
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user